previous entry | main | next entry


January 10, 2007

It's Always About Me

First off, avaunt ye minions of darkness and chaos! In spite of all you could do, I have won my way through to the goblin castle! (Extra points for anyone who can name the movie that quote came from.) And, while I'm at it, nyah-nyah-nyah to the forces of law and light! You had your chance to whack me with a big, fat ticket for driving on expired tags and you missed it. I am now smugly, complacently, thoroughly legal!

I need gas, though. I'm driving on fumes. That, along with dropping a package off at the post office, are today's lunchtime chores. This appears to be one of those times in my life when things around me are decaying and expiring faster than I can keep up with them.

Second off, hooray! That's for the storm that's supposed to roll in here tomorrow and linger until Saturday. They've downgraded our forecast and are now saying we shouldn't get more than four inches in the city. (We went to the grocery store last night and stocked up anyhow. Just in case.)

Third, the diet. I am wiping the slate clean of the first nine days of this month and beginning again. Sigh. I have, as always, been doing exceptionally well during the days and eating like a pig every evening.

For example, last night I had half a pan of lasagna and yes, admittedly the box said there were only two servings in the pan, but the point remains that someone on a diet shouldn't be eating lasagna at all, much less in "normal" quantities. (I brought some for lunch today, too. Hee! But a much smaller portion.)

Fourth, I'm ready to give up on Gemmell. Some of you know that I've been trying to work my way through his Drenai books. I finished another one last night (Waylander) and contemplated the series for a while, trying to figure out how what happened in this book fit in with the rest of the series and why it mattered.

While I freely admit that in the last chapter or so, they made mention that two characters were going to reproduce and produce a figure of major importance to the overall storyline, I also have to point out that they and their "love storyline" were far from central in the book, leading one to expect that something else of major significance was taking place.

In the end, I decided that one could expect that, but one would be disappointed. I'm not buying any more of his stuff. I've read half a dozen books by him and I'm always let down.

Next up on the reading list is Saylor's Rubicon. I have no fear I won't enjoy that.

After that, I have Ray Bradbury's Farewell Summer waiting, but I'm hesitant to start reading it. Dandelion Wine was such a seminal book for me that I'm afraid of tarnishing the magic with a possibly less-than stellar sequel. Admittedly, Bradbury has almost never, ever, disappointed me, but I'm still somewhat afraid.

I have LeCarré's Absolute Friends waiting, too. It's been waiting for seven or eight months now. I'm not sure why I haven't read it yet. I've read and been fascinated by 20 books from this author. I took an entire class on him while I was in college. Why have I never followed through on reading this one? It's a mystery.

Also, thanks to the holiday generosity and extreme good taste of my friend, Mallory, I have Bitter Chocolate: Investigating the Dark Side of the World's Most Seductive Sweet waiting to be read.

It's all very exciting and I'm almost sorry that we won't be getting snowed in again any time soon. I have a lot of reading I could be doing.

I'm meeting a friend for dinner tonight. Meghan's involved in some kind of monthly (weekly?) group that gets together and does knitting. And stuff. I think. It's called "stitch and bitch." I don't really know what they bitch about, but I brought my latest project (another scarf), so I can "stitch." It's not knitting, it's crochet, but I doubt if they kick me out for that reason.

And that's pretty much it for excitement since yesterday.

You know what I think this blog needs? It needs a theme. It needs to be about something.

posted by AnneZook on 01.10.07 at 08:40 AM





Comments:

It's been a long time since I read Bradbury, but I never really read his stuff in any kind of sequence. Probably because I started reading him with a SFBC compendium of his short stories, then went around filling in by getting collections, etc. His novels are so much like collections of short stories anyway....

There are times when his tendency to recycle bothers me, but as, I think it was Hemingway, said, truly great authors write the same book over and over. If I spent more time thinking about it, I'd pay more attention to how the material changes subtly with context. But I'm usually having way too much fun with the elegance of the language and the amazing imagery to think that structurally.

posted by: Jonathan Dresner on 01.10.07 at 12:37 PM [permalink]



Theme? Feh.

Blogging is.

posted by: Ahistoricality on 01.10.07 at 12:38 PM [permalink]



Jonathan - It's precisely the elegance of Bradbury's writing that captivates me. It's the poetry of his descriptions, the precision of his language, that I fall in love with over and over again.

I notice the recycling. This is something that, in many other authors, annoys me extremely. For some reason, it never annoys me with Bradbury. He makes it fresh enough each time to get away with it. :) (Although I can't vouch for the impact of sitting down and reading 20 of his books one after the other--the recycling could be irritating that way.)

posted by: Anne on 01.10.07 at 01:38 PM [permalink]



Ahistoricality - In fact, I'm always threatening to get a theme. :) And never quite getting around to finding one. I like having a place where I can talk about anything.

Like, if I had time today, I'd be complaining about Bush opening 15 million acres or whatever it was in Alaska, for oil drilling, and speculating on the weirdness of both New York and Austin having "smells" on the same day (Big Brother is gassing you!) and chatting about really long book series and wondering how authors manage to keep the excitement and enthusiasm and continuity going for decades.

Sadly, work calls.

posted by: Anne on 01.10.07 at 01:41 PM [permalink]



I hadn't heard about Austin: that is odd. We were talking at the breakfast table about the NY smell, and the Little Anachronism is now firmly convinced that there's a feral army of huge skunks -- 1009 of them, our current favorite number -- prepared to assault major cities.... which would make a fantastic horror spoof, if you ask me.

posted by: Ahistoricality on 01.11.07 at 11:11 AM [permalink]



Well, it would have to be better than that ridiculous one where people were being menaced by frogs, right? (I mean--not even giant frogs. Just--frogs. And all they did was sit there and ribbit at people. Whattheheck?)

Austin was about dead birds. I was remembering coal miners taking canaries down in the shafts where them when I read that there was a huge, inexplicable bird die-off that morning in Austin and that they didn't know why downtown was littered with carcasses.

posted by: Anne on 01.11.07 at 11:24 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?