previous entry | main | next entry


July 19, 2005

MangaYaoiShounenAiAndStuff

So, what about that manga/yaoi stuff, anyhow?

For reference, the books I bought were a duology, Until the Full Moon, or something like that. Interesting concept, shallow handling.

I talked to Rapunzel last night. She said she has the first of these two and that she didn't really like it that well, so maybe I just didn't choose the right book(s) to experiment on, I don't know.

The books I read while on the Familial Visit, Rapunzel's books, were the Fake series. I don't why "Fake," but I enjoyed them. I'd like to see more like those, if I knew how to find them. I'm not sure it's a fair experiment to read something that's maybe not as good (like the ones I mentioned above) and to dismiss the rest of the genre on those grounds?

In my ongoing question for Information and Education, I did a bit of surfing last night.

Imagine my surprise when I discovered that you can actually d/l some scanned/translated stories, free of charge, on the net! I'm assuming these will be the same picture format, although I confined myself to bookmarking last night and didn't actually look at any of the stories.

Imagine my amusement when I discovered the manga/yaoi "fandom" and read that it's tolerated, even tacitly encouraged overseas.

Imagine my interest when I found a site of definitions. (Imagine my surprise when I learned that "yaoi" stands for, ""yama nasi, ochi nashi, imi nashi," which roughly translates to "no climax, no plot, no point.") (Imagine my further surprise when I discovered that a story that's a, "lemon" isn't a bad one, it's a story with sex. And that "lime" and "citrus" have their own places on the sexual scale o'manga/yaoi.)

(Imagine my embarrassment as I realize I should have memorized those definitions before I started writing this post.)

I love the internet. If I wanted to put the effort into it, I could be an "expert" on this stuff in a week.

OTOH, I haven't really decided if I want to or not. The problem is that I'm not visual.

Most people are visual. That is, their preferred mode of taking in information is through their eyes. "You have to see it, to believe it" style of thing. (Something like...70% 80% of the population? Is primarily visual)

This explains the amazing popularity of television. And of movie adaptations of books. And, I've decided, of manga.

But I'm not visual, I'm auditory. For instance, I rarely watch television. I listen to television. When I read, which I do voraciously, I "hear" the text, I don't "see" it on the page.

There aren't enough words in manga/yaoi. For instance, those Moon books I bought? I'm going to have to go through them again, spending some time consciously staring at the pictures to see if they're as shallowly written as I thought they were at first.

Sigh. I'm about to start calling my employed friends and asking them if they'd like to hire me. I'm really bored of not working.

(P.S. I'm going to have t0 stop dissing Bossyboots. He just brought me spoils from the training conference.

A tee-shirt, two little blue rubber men, and a jump drive which I understand from McSwain! Is a gem of a thing to have, indeed.

Right now, my two blue boys are having sex, but that's just how I accidentally laid them down on the desk. I hate to interrupt, though. It seems impolite not to wait until they've finished.

How do you know when a rubber man is finished? I guess I'll just wait for him to stop bouncing and to start looking for his pants.)

posted by AnneZook on 07.19.05 at 03:19 PM





Comments:

The love of little blue rubber men is pure and sacred.

posted by: McSwain! on 07.19.05 at 06:30 PM [permalink]



Pure. And sacred.

posted by: Anne on 07.19.05 at 07:09 PM [permalink]



Let me know if you figure out the attraction of the cartoon smut. My usual feeling is that cartoons don't have sex. And I'm with you on the verbal as opposed to visual thing. Well, except when I'm ogling teh hawt on my source material :)

posted by: Dail on 07.20.05 at 09:38 AM [permalink]



I'm with you on the ogling, which I like as well as anyone, but it's not where I draw my slash inspiration from.

To repeat an earlier lecture, there are three primary modes of absorbing information. Most people are a mix of all three, but it's the dominant and the percentage of each that vary from person to person.

Visual (almost everyone has this as #1)
Auditory (second-largest group)
Kinesthetic (Very rare to have this as your primary mode. This is touch.)

For instance, I'm A-K-V. I learn/absorb information best by listening, then by taking notes (the physical/kinesthetic act of writing helps "lock in" the information I'm hearing) and lastly by seeing, although the difference between my K and V components isn't extreme.

The point is that a medium that relies upon static pictures of people's facial expressions isn't natural for me. It doesn't tap into my primary method of absorbing information. Now that I've discovered that this medium is essentially a comic-book form of PWP, I'm not sure I can get what I'm looking for.

The "Fake" books worked because in seven volumes, I got enough words to define the characters' voices.

And yet...the books I've read, even the "Moon" books, had an undeniable charm. I'm not immune, or indifferent, to visuals, so maybe it's just that it's going to take some practice for me to settle into this new genre.

I rather regret that I don't have access to the "Fake" series now that I'm back home. My first impression was positive and I'd be interested in reading them again to take a second look.

posted by: Anne on 07.20.05 at 12:04 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?