Why do so many people have so many quiz results as blog entries? Sometimes people have entire entries that are nothing but quiz results. This confuses me but I'm about to do much the same thing.

Reading someone's blog tonight, I see another of those "lists" is going around. I've never done one before but I feel bloggy tonight with nothing particular to talk about, so here goes. (Except that these lists are always so positive and I'd rather be more balanced, so I'm including mistakes and disasters.)

Best story I think I've written: Ummm...I don't have that high an opinion of my stuff, but I have an invisible sister who insists that I list "Alley Trap."

Favorite story of mine: "Billowing Seas"
I had more fun writing that than anything else I've ever written.

Most underrated story of mine: Dunno
I doubt it's possible to underrate one of my stories. Maybe "Billowing Seas" because I thought it was funny when I wrote it but only one person read it. (Can something be underrated if it's completely unread? Or does "underrated" have to be something people have read and didn't think much of? And how would you know if you don't get feedback on anything?)

Most overrated story of mine: "Going Deep"
I've had a dozen feedback notes on that one, which is some kind of record for one of my stories, but it's sadly flawed, the sex doesn't fit the characters, and the plot just sort of fades away without a proper resolution.

Story of mine I can actually re-read and enjoy: N/A
I've never re-read one of my own stories, sorry.

Story I most regret trying:
The NaNoWriMo psuedo-novel I just wrote. (I don't think I wanted to know that I could write that badly.)

Technique I most regret attempting: SM
Shudder. I should never have done it. What a load of crap I churned out during that experimentation. I am irretrievably vanilla and at peace with that. (Although, a little light bondage....)

Worst story I ever wrote: Tie
That's a tie between a challenge-induced Methos/Richie attempt (Shudder.) and an SM Skinner/Krycek thing.